|
|
|
New Trial Required in Murder Case Where State Fails to Properly Authenticate Social Media Evidence
(September 2011) By Colleen K. O’Brien
For more information, contact Paul
Farquharson.
Griffin v. State,
No. 74 (Maryland Court of Appeals, April 28, 2011) | View pdf
In Griffin v. State, the Maryland Court of Appeals held
that the authentication of a MySpace page by a police detective at trial was
insufficient, requiring reversal of the defendant’s murder conviction and a new
trial.
At trial, the State sought to introduce printouts from the
MySpace page of the defendant’s girlfriend, to argue that she had threatened a
key witness in the case. The detective in the case was asked to authenticate the
pages by identifying the girlfriend’s face from her profile photograph and date
of birth and location from the user’s profile page. To the Court, her face, date
of birth, and location were not “sufficient distinctive characteristics” to
authenticate the MySpace printout. The Court reasoned that there was a
“potential for abuse and manipulation of a social networking site by someone
other than its purported creator and/or user” which required a greater degree of
authentication than was employed at trial.
The Court was concerned that anyone could create a
fictitious account and masquerade under another person’s name or gain access
to another’s account by obtaining the user’s username and password. In order
to alleviate this concern, the Court offered several ways to authenticate
such social media pages in the future. First, counsel could ask the
purported creator if she created the profile and if she authored the post at
issue. Second, the proponent could search the computer of the person who
allegedly created the profile and posting to examine the computer’s internet
history and hard drive to determine whether that computer was used to
originate the social networking profile and posting in question. Third, the
proponent could obtain information directly from the social networking site
to link the profile to the creator.
Judge Harrell wrote a dissenting opinion, and was
joined by Judge Murphy. The dissenters urged the Court to adopt the federal
courts’ interpretation of the analogous federal evidence rule. Under that
rule, the document is properly authenticated if a “reasonable juror” could
find in favor of its authenticity. To Judge Harrell, a reasonable juror
could have concluded that the MySpace profile was indeed of the defendant’s
girlfriend; and, moreover, there was no evidence in the record of a motive
to fabricate the page.
|
|
|