Conditions of Carriage are part of an Airline Ticket Contract
(December 2011) By Kevin M. Cox, Associate
For more information, contact Paul
Farquharson.
Lavine v. American Airlines, Inc.,
(Md. App.) (Dec. 1, 2011) | View pdf
Plaintiffs, Deborah and Matt Lavine (the “Lavines”),
purchased two round-trip airline tickets from American Airlines, Inc (“American
Airlines”). After buying the tickets, the Lavines received an email, the subject
line of which read: “E-Ticket Confirmation”. A summary of the terms and
conditions of travel was available by selecting the “Conditions of Carriage”
button in the email. The Conditions of Carriage button was conspicuous. The
referenced Conditions of Carriage clearly stated that the Tickets and the
Conditions of Carriage constituted the contract. Matt Lavine, however, stated in
an affidavit that he did not see or receive the document, “Conditions of
Carriage.”
On December 21, 2008, upon arrival at the airport to board
their flight, the Lavines were informed that their initial flight was delayed.
An American Airlines representative allegedly represented that the delay would
not affect their connecting flight; However, the Lavines were in fact denied
entry to their connecting flight because they did not arrive thirty (30) minutes
prior to the scheduled flight time. Additionally, though the Lavines were
allegedly told that their connecting flight had departed prior to their arrival
for the connecting flight, they claimed that their connecting flight did not
depart for an hour past the time that they arrived in order to board the
connecting flight. American Airlines provided the Lavines with a hotel room for
the night, and a stipend for dinner and breakfast. On the following day, the
Lavines boarded a flight to their destination, which was Key West, Florida.
Six (6) months later, the Lavines filed a five (5)
count Complaint consisting of various counts of negligent and intentional
misrepresentation. Each of the Lavines sought $10,000.00 in compensatory
damages and $10,000.00 in punitive damages.
American Airlines filed a Motion for Summary Judgment
four (4) months after the filing of the Complaint, which was granted by the
Circuit Court for Howard County. The Lavines filed the instant appeal. One
of the issues presented to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland was
whether there was a dispute of material fact regarding the Conditions of
Carriage.
The Lavines contended that there was a dispute of
material fact regarding whether they both saw and agreed to the Conditions
of Carriage, a document the significance of which was readily apparent.
Essentially, the Lavines argued that the Conditions of Carriage were not
part of the contract of carriage.
Section 41707 of the Airline Deregulation Act (“ADA”)
provides that, “[t]o the extent the Secretary of Transportation prescribes
by regulation, an air carrier may incorporate by reference in a ticket or
written instrument any term of the contract for providing interstate air
transportation.” By regulation, “[a] ticket or other written instrument that
embodies the contract of carriage may incorporate contract terms by
reference (i.e., without stating their full text), and if it does so shall
contain or be accompanied by notice to the passenger . . . .” 14 CFR §
253.4(a). The ticket or written instrument must include a “conspicuous
notice” that “[a]ny terms incorporated by reference are part of the contract
. . . .” Id. at § 253.5(a). The incorporated terms may include information
regarding the “[r]ights of the carrier and limitations concerning delay or
failure to perform service, including schedule changes, substitution of
alternate air carrier or aircraft, and rerouting.” Id. at § 253.5(b)(5).
In the Court’s view, the ADA and regulations authorized
by it permitted American Airlines to incorporate by reference the Conditions
of Carriage to the “E-Ticket Confirmation” email and – more importantly –
they were a part of the contract between the Lavines and American Airlines.
Therefore, the Lavines’ assertion that they did not receive or see the
Conditions of Carriage before or after of the purchase of the tickets did
not create a genuine dispute of material fact.