|
|
|
Court Construes Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act in Buyer's Favor
(July 2010) By Colleen K. O'Brien, Summer Associate
For more information, contact Paul Farquharson.
Long v. Merrifield Town Center Ltd. P'ship,
o. 08-2371 (United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, July 13, 2010) available at
http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/dailyopinions/opinion.pdf/082371.P.pdf
Plaintiffs Melvin and Mary Long, condominium buyers, sought
to rescind their contract with a condominium developer and obtain a refund of
their deposit. They initiated a lawsuit against the developer involving the
Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act ("ILSFDA"), codified at 15 U.S.C. §
1701 et seq., and its Improved Lot Exception, § 1702(a)(2).
The ILSFDA is a statute that seeks to prevent interstate
land fraud and to protect unsuspecting and ill-informed investors from buying
undesirable land. The statute requires certain disclosures be made prior to a
purchaser's execution of a sales contract. However, the ILSFDA does not apply in
all cases and has certain exceptions. One exception, the Improved Lot Exception,
U.S.C. § 1702(a)(2), applies when a buyer is assured that the lot he is
purchasing either already contains a building or structure or will contain one
within two years of the purchase date. The guarantee of construction within a
reasonably short time negates some of the concern the purchaser may have about
being defrauded by unscrupulous developers.
The issue before the Court was the date the Improved Lot
Exception's two-year period began to run. The purchasers argued for a narrow
construction of the Exception. Their argument was that the two-year period began
to run when a purchaser signed the sales contract. The developer argued for a
broad construction of the Exception. Their argument was that the two-year period
began to run when the developer ratified the sales contract. In this case, the
developer's policy was to ratify sales contracts between one and three months
after the contracts were signed by the purchasers.
The Court agreed with the purchasers and opted for a narrow
construction of the Improved Lot Exception. The Court determined that the
two-year period began to run when the purchasers signed the sales contracts, not
when the developer ratified the sales contracts, sometimes up to three months
later. To the Court, extending the two-year period to the date of ratification
by the developer would frustrate and defeat the purpose of the ILSFDA, which
protected buyers. "‘To confer on sellers the power to extend the two-year period
by delaying ‘ratification'—perhaps indefinitely—would allow sellers to engage in
an end-run around ILSFDA's protections, a result plainly contrary to Congress's
carefully crafted scheme to protect property purchasers.'" Long at *10 (quoting
Ahn v. Merrifield Center Ltd. P’ship, 584 F. Supp. 2d 848, 855 (E.D. Va. 2008)).
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that because the
developer's sales contracts did not require the developer to construct and
deliver the condominiums inside of two years from the purchaser's signing of the
contracts, the Improved Lot Exemption of the ILSFDA did not apply. Consequently,
the Court reversed the district court's order dismissing the purchaser's ILSFDA
claims and remanded the case.
|
|
|