Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

Waiver of Filing Fee under PLA

Williams v. Circuit Court for Washington County, et al., No. 1394 (Md. App., Nov. 3, 2010) | View pdf

The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of Petitioner Ray Lucky Williams for waiver of pre-payment of the filing fee. Williams sought judicial review of an administrative agency decision, which required payment of a $30.00 fee. The issue was whether the Circuit Court properly denied Williams' request for waiver of the pre-payment of the filing fee.

The Prisoner Litigation Act ("PLA"), codified at Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-1002(c), provides in pertinent part:

A court may waive payment of the entire required filing fee for a civil action filed by a prisoner only on a written showing under oath by the prisoner:

(1) the prisoner is indigent;
(2) the issue presented is of serious concern;
(3) delay in the consideration of the issues presented will prejudice the consideration of the claim;
(4) the prisoner is not likely to accumulate sufficient funds to pay the required filing fee within a reasonable period of time; and
(5) the prisoner possesses a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of the claim.

Williams was transferred from the Eastern Correctional Institution to the Maryland Correctional Institution in Hagerstown. In 2009, Williams filed a challenge to the transfer with the Maryland Division of Corrections. In support of his request, Williams alleged that he had known and unknown enemies in the Hagerstown facility stemming from his cooperation and participation in a murder investigation conducted in Baltimore City. He further alleged that the Correctional Institution Administration had knowledge of those enemies. Williams requested that he be transferred back to the Eastern Correctional Institution.

The warden denied Williams' request stating that there were insufficient details provided to determine the basis for an investigation. Williams was instructed to resubmit his request by a later date and provide the names of known enemies for verification.

William declined to resubmit his request opting to appeal the warden's decision to the Commissioner of Corrections. The Commissioner denied Williams' appeal for failure to follow the warden's instructions of resubmittal of the request. Williams' subsequent administrative appeals also failed for similar reasons.

On July 24, 2009, Williams sought judicial review of the decision in Circuit Court for Washington County. He also sought a waiver of pre-payment of the filing fee. In support of the request for fee waiver, Williams stated that he was incarcerated, had no money, and earned approximately $21.50 per month, which was spent on necessities including soap, detergent and toiletries.

The Circuit Court denied Williams' request for waiver of the filing fee. The Court stated that the "entire filing fee may not be waived unless, from information provided, the Court finds that the inmate is indigent, not likely to accumulate sufficient funds to pay the filing fee within a reasonable period to time and possesses a reasonable likelihood of success on the issues of serous concern." The Court did, however, reduce the amount of his filing fee to $30.00, pursuant Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-1002(b).

Williams appealed the decision to the Court of Special Appeals arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request for waived filing fee. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the trial court explaining that Williams did not elaborate on his reasons for the alleged retaliation against him. Specifically, the intermediate appellate court failed to find that there would be prejudice as a result of the delay in considering issues presented in the underlying claim. The record was devoid of any reason to support this prong of the test.

It was not enough to show that the Petitioner may be indigent. Williams had to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the claim, as well as an ability to accumulate sufficient funds to pay the required filing fee. Without such showing, the trial court was correct in denying Petitioner's request for a waiver of the filing fee.


 Powered By SLEEPER Technologies, Inc Professional Web Design

An STI Site  | Web Design By SLEEPER Technologiesimage
Copyright © 5/17/2012 Semmes, Bowen & Semmes | All Rights Reserved | Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without the express written permission of Semmes Bowen & Semmes is prohibited.
Disclaimer and link information regarding this web site