Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

Four Year Statute of Limitations for Violations of Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Worsham v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc., No. 1058 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. – September 2009)

Paul Worsham ("Worsham") filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, alleging that he had received a telephone solicitor’s call that violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ("TCPA"), as set forth in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(B). Specifically, Worsham alleged that telemarketers promoting Fairfield Resorts ("Fairfield") had unlawfully called his home using automated dialing equipment – both the telemarketing company and Fairfield Resorts, Inc. were named as defendants in the lawsuit. Worsham’s Complaint further alleged that the telemarketer’s prerecorded solicitation failed to provide the true name of the individual caller, in violation of 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(e)(2)(iv). Worsham sought statutory damages in the amount of $500 for each violation and an injunction prohibiting further automated calls to any residential telephone lines.

Fairfield filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, pursuant to Md. Rule 2-322(b)(2). In its motion, Fairfield argued that Worsham’s claims were barred by Maryland’s three-year statute of limitations. Fairfield also argued that the federal statutes did not provide a private cause of action.

The Circuit Court determined that the four-year statute of limitations established by 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a) was not applicable to private rights of action filed pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3); and Maryland’s three year statute of limitations applied. The Circuit Court dismissed Worsham’s Complaint, holding that the Complaint was barred by limitations. Worsham appealed the dismissal.

The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland found that the federal statutes, in fact, explicitly provided for a private cause of action. As to the issue of limitations, the Court of Special Appeals held that the right to pursue a private cause of action for violations of the federal statutes was governed by the four year federal "catch all" limitation period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a).

The Court of Special Appeals vacated the decision of the Circuit Court and remanded the matter, holding that Worsham’s Complaint was not barred by Maryland’s three year statute of limitations, and should not have been dismissed on that basis.


 Powered By SLEEPER Technologies, Inc Professional Web Design

An STI Site  | Web Design By SLEEPER Technologiesimage
Copyright © 2/7/2012 Semmes, Bowen & Semmes | All Rights Reserved | Reproduction in whole or in part
in any form or medium without the express written permission of Semmes Bowen & Semmes is prohibited.
Disclaimer and link information regarding this web site